Is all history objective? Subjective? Can we really know?
When we study history, we look at primary sources (I mean documents, in particular). But how do we know those documents aren't full of :shit: ? No one really knows what happened except for the people who were there.
I think history is neither objective nor subjective. It's not objective because we don't know if the information is completely true. But it's not subjective either. Subjectivity and objectivity aren't always opposites.